What ismy caseworth?
The value of a legal claim is shaped by a specific set of facts: liability clarity, injury severity and documentation, economic damages, jurisdiction rules, comparative fault, insurance limits, and comparable case outcomes. No two matters are identical — but understanding which facts move the range is the essential first step.
Caseworth's free Lexstimate surfaces the observed outcome range for cases like yours — drawn from comparable resolved matters in your jurisdiction. Not a guess. Not a multiplier. A real benchmark.
Educational benchmark only · Not legal advice · Free to start · No credit card required
Based on 340 comparable cases in Florida
Florida §768.81 — Comparative fault: without shared fault, the full observed range typically applies.
Educational benchmark only · Not legal advice · Sourced from comparable case outcomes · Results do not constitute a guarantee or prediction
What facts matter when determiningwhat your case is worth?
Settlement value and verdict outcomes in comparable resolved cases are not random. Eight categories of facts consistently move the range — upward when they favor the claimant, downward when they do not. Understanding all eight before any negotiation starts is the essential preparation.
Cases where fault is clear and well-documented historically settle at a higher range than cases with shared or contested liability. Evidence of negligence — photos, witness statements, police reports, surveillance — strengthens the factual foundation that courts and insurers evaluate.
Objective, documented injuries (MRI findings, surgical records, specialist notes) have historically driven higher ranges than soft tissue or subjective-only complaints. Consistent, timely medical care creates the paper trail that comparable cases show supports broader ranges.
Quantifiable economic losses form the measurable floor in most comparable resolved cases. Total medical expenses — past and reasonably projected future — plus documented lost wages, lost earning capacity, and out-of-pocket costs all move the range upward in proportion to their verifiable size.
Pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, emotional distress, and loss of consortium are recognized categories of compensable harm in most jurisdictions. Their weight in comparable outcomes varies by jurisdiction, jury tendencies in that venue, and the strength of documentation.
Courts operate under state-specific rules. Damage caps on non-economic damages, comparative fault thresholds, statute of limitations windows, and venue tendencies all shape what comparable cases in that jurisdiction have resolved for. A case that resolves for one amount in Florida may see a materially different range in Texas.
If you share any responsibility for the incident, jurisdictions apply comparative or contributory fault rules. In pure comparative fault states, your share of fault reduces the range proportionally. In contributory negligence states, any fault may bar recovery. This factor alone can move the effective range dramatically.
Available coverage is a practical ceiling in the majority of resolved cases that do not go to trial. When the at-fault party's liability limits are low and no umbrella policy or underinsured motorist coverage applies, comparable cases show the range compresses toward the coverage ceiling regardless of injury severity.
Gaps in treatment — periods where you stopped receiving care — are routinely used to argue injury minimization. Cases that reached maximum medical improvement (MMI) with complete, continuous records have historically resolved at higher ranges than cases with unexplained gaps. MMI status also establishes when future care projections can be accurately made.
How much is my case worth?Here's what the data shows.
The honest answer: no website can tell you exactly how much your case is worth. Anyone who gives you a single number without knowing your jurisdiction, your injury documentation, your economic damages, and how fault is allocated is guessing.
What comparable resolved cases can tell you is a range — and the facts that push outcomes toward the top or bottom of it. That range is the foundation you need before any negotiation begins.
Caseworth's Lexstimate is built on this principle: cases like yours have ranged from X to Y in your jurisdiction, based on the same categories of fact that apply to your situation. That is an educational benchmark grounded in comparable outcomes. It is never a guarantee or a prediction.
Courts and insurers evaluate claims against what similar cases resolved for. The Lexstimate surfaces that observed range from public case data in your jurisdiction — not a multiplier formula.
Strong liability plus thorough injury documentation plus clear economic damages pushes outcomes toward the upper end. Gaps in any one category compress the range. All eight factors interact.
In the majority of resolved cases that settle before trial, available policy limits constrain the practical range. Understanding coverage on both sides is part of any informed assessment.
State-specific damage caps, comparative fault thresholds, and venue tendencies mean the same facts produce materially different ranges in different states. Generic national averages obscure this.
What comparable cases have rangedby claim type.
The ranges below reflect observed outcomes in comparable resolved cases across supported jurisdictions. They are educational benchmarks only — not predictions, not legal advice, and not guarantees. Your specific facts will move your range within, above, or below these illustrative bands.
Range driven by injury severity, liability clarity, and whether surgery or long-term care is documented.
Notice to property owner, injury documentation, and comparative fault allocation are the primary range movers.
Expert testimony establishing standard-of-care deviation is essential. Jurisdictional caps significantly affect upper-end outcomes.
Documentation of discriminatory intent, lost wages, and whether reinstatement is sought affect the range.
Rent paid, documented repair requests, and local tenant protection statutes are the core range factors.
FDCPA and state-law violations carry statutory damages and attorney fee-shifting that materially change outcomes.
Educational benchmarks only · Not legal advice · Sourced from comparable case outcomes · Results do not constitute a guarantee or prediction · Your jurisdiction may differ
What factors determinesettlement value?
Insurers, opposing counsel, and courts apply the same framework when assessing settlement value — even if they reach different conclusions. Understanding that framework before any negotiation is the preparation that levels the playing field.
- →Past and future medical expenses (documented)
- →Lost wages and reduced earning capacity
- →Out-of-pocket costs directly caused by the incident
- →Projected future care costs (when MMI not yet reached)
- →Pain and suffering (past and future)
- →Loss of enjoyment of life
- →Emotional distress with documented impact
- →Loss of consortium (in applicable jurisdictions)
- →Clarity of fault (police reports, surveillance, witnesses)
- →Comparative fault percentage assigned to claimant
- →Prior incidents at the same location (premises cases)
- →Employer liability exposure (respondeat superior)
- →At-fault party liability policy limits
- →Underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage available
- →Umbrella or excess policy applicability
- →Defendant's independent assets (collectibility)
We know exactlywhere the line is.
Caseworth is designed around the line between education and advice. Everything we deliver is legal information — not legal counsel. That distinction is not a limitation. It is the product.
Caseworth translates public case law, statutes, and resolved-case data into plain language that any person can read and act on.
"Cases like yours have ranged from X to Y" — never "your case is worth $X." The distinction is the entire point.
Caseworth surfaces what courts require and what deadlines apply. Framed as procedural information, not legal advice.
When your situation calls for representation, Caseworth bridges you to the right attorney with your benchmark and claim type already in hand.
Free benchmark — no card needed
See the range for cases like yours. Start free.
Your free Lexstimate surfaces the observed outcome range from comparable resolved cases in your jurisdiction — the benchmark range you should know before any negotiation begins.
Get My Free Lexstimate →10,000 free credits on signup · No credit card required · Educational benchmark only · Not legal advice
Frequently asked aboutcase value.
Know the benchmark rangefor cases like yours.Start free today.
Get your Lexstimate report with 10,000 free credits — no credit card required. See the observed outcome range from comparable cases in your jurisdiction, understand the facts that move it, and walk into any conversation informed.